‘The Undateables’

Molly Mattingly, Head of Learning Disability Programmes:

"Any regular Channel 4 viewers will have found it hard to miss the new tv series currently airing called ‘The Undateable’s’. Following the love lives of several British singletons, this series has caused controversy over its title alone. Although the participants were informed of the title before it was aired, many viewers feel it is sensationalist and goes against the hard work of many who campaign for people with learning disabilities (or other disabilities) to be seen as the same as everyone else.  Branding people as ‘undateable’ in the title, even if this is not the message the show wants to portray, will stick in peoples’ minds and further reinforce negative attitudes towards people with disabilities.

However, some may argue that getting a prime time show which features people who don’t have the typical model looks we are used to seeing on our screens, and instead, shows real people with disabilities leading full and independent lives is enough of a pay-off to warrant the title. How many people would have tuned in if the title had been phrased in a softer and more palatable way? Isn’t the main point that this programme is showing a side to society that is rarely given such media coverage, no matter what got them to start watching in the first place?

Both of these arguments are valid. The title of the programme is sensationalist (Channel 4 want people to watch it after all) and probably unnecessarily so. Although the people in the series are shown in a positive and respectful manner, it is still reinforcing associations of people with disabilities as being ‘different’, not capable of finding meaningful relationships nor enjoying the same social life as everyone else without our intervention.

Despite this, the programme does show people with learning disabilities living independently. Shane, who has a learning disability and Richard, who has Asperger syndrome, both show the potential that people with learning disabilities or autistic spectrum disorders have in leading fulfilling lives. How often do you get to see people with learning disabilities on television without it being in the wake of scandals such as Winterbourne View as seen on BBC’s Panorama.

The main point of the programme should be that this is the story of several people who want to find love. This is a universal struggle that every member of society can identify with, whether you are disabled or not. Lack of confidence, not connecting with the community and meeting potential partners through natural networks of work and friends is a universal issue as proved by the surge in popularity of dating services in the UK over the last few years. The types of disability featured in the programme may compound the difficulties faced in finding a partner but they are not the only reason for their situation. Hopefully, in the future we will live in a society which will not need to sensationalise those with disabilities in order to make people interested in their stories. "
Published 13 April 2012 |
Email Blog

Comments

There is 1 comment.

  • Thanks Molly -- this is a very well balanced piece -- in contast to some of the other rather knee jerk views, for example from officials of the UKDPC and EDF. My son, Sam features in the final episode on Tuesday at 9PM. We thought hard about whether Sam should participate and Sam decided he wanted to because he wanted to try to find a girlfriend and to try to offer a positive image of a young man with a learning disability. Sam is now very glad he decided to do it. So am I. The process was very inclusive. The Director and production team explained clearly what they wanted to acheive and asked Sam's opinion all the way through. It was always clear that Sam wouldn't do anything he did't feel comfortable with and that he could walk away from the project at any time if he wanted to. There was a thorough but relaxed psychological assessment before filming started and the producers stayed in constant touch to make sure Sam was happy with how things were going. We discussed the title with the production team. Sam was unphased by it. I had reservations about it but came to the view that it was provocative and would create debate but was not offensive.Sam & I were shown the billboard photographs before they went out. If we had serious objections I feel sure they would have been listened to -- but we didn't. The Director told us before filming started that we would see the episode before it was finalised and that if we were unhappy with any parts of the portrayal they would change it. We were very pleased with it and didn't need to ask for any changes. This has been a very positive experience for Sam and he has really enjoyed it. We think the programmes are warm, sensitive and help viewers to get past labels and "conditions" very quickly to see the real people behind them as they look for love with all the risks and joys that involves for us all whether we happen to have a disability or not.

    Malcolm Barnard 13 April 2012
Add Comment